I agree the marginal cost is low (though not zero), but the claim about degradation of the base is pure baloney. Owning a mailing list of past supporters does not guarantee that they will be future supporters. Certainly, it's an asset to have, but it would only permit a delayed entry if a large portion of those people could be assured to be with him in the next primary.
How many of those names were there before he was the Democrat nominee? The names that he picked up during the primary might be considered a base, but the general election names only preferred him over Bush ... not necessarily over any other Democrat.
For example, of those 3 million, how many are also on Howard Dean's list? Or John Edwards'?
Email lists from previous campaigns are valuable, but they'll only take you so far, especially in presidential politics where voters tend to be more fickle.
Friday, May 20, 2005
It might not actually be as bad as spamming, but using an old email list of 3 million supporters from his 2004 Presidential run (firstname.lastname@example.org included) may not actually be that great of an idea. I sort of made this point a few weeks ago, but other folks make it sound so much better. Take it away, Chip Griffin: