Since then, there has been a more than healthy email conversation. Not as public as I would have liked, but there have been some changes in how I'd propose the compromise now. Those changes are reflected here.
The nut of the compromise is that someone can't just show up one day, pay their $20 and be a member. They have to prove their commitment through a series of options, such as being a member of a TCD committee. One of the changes to the propose bylaw outlines who decides when someone has been active enough to become a voting member. In the current draft, it would be the Executive Committee, in a manner similar to how they approve unelected PCOs.
While most of the emails discussing the change have been supportive, not all have, including Guy Hoyle-Dodson's from this morning:
This is asinine. Are you deliberately trying to drive away involvement by rank and file democrats? This kind of strident money grubbing, pedantic exclusiveness, and distain for keeping the county party a truly open public institution will only end in the total irrelevance of the TCD. It is just the outcome that was feared when dues were thrust upon us two years ago. Then as now, it is not well thought out.